Same class, different activity: Delamanid and pretomanid have comparable bactericidal activity but pretomanid potently inhibits Mycobacterium tuberculosis ribosomal rRNA synthesis

Abstract

Background: The nitroimidazoles delamanid and pretomanid play an important role in contemporary tuberculosis treatment. It is unclear whether delamanid and pretomanid have meaningfully different activity since both reduce Mycobacterium tuberculosis colony forming units (CFU) similarly in animal models. The RS ratio is a pharmacodynamic marker of ongoing rRNA synthesis that has been associated with treatment-shortening (i.e., sterilizing) activity.

Methods: Using Mycobacterium tuberculosis Erdman, we conducted dose-ranging studies in aerobic axenic culture and in the conventional BALB/c mouse high-dose aerosol infection model to compare bactericidal and RS ratio activity of delamanid and pretomanid.

Results: In vitro concentration-response curves showed that delamanid and pretomanid had similar RS ratio effect at maximal concentration but pretomanid was more potent, achieving 90% of the maximal effect (RS-EC₉₀) at a lower concentration (390 ng/mL) than delamanid (810 ng/mL). In mice, delamanid and pretomanid had similar effects on CFU. Human-equivalent doses of delamanid (6 mg/kg) and pretomanid (50 mg/kg) resulted in plasma C_max concentrations well below (210 ng/mL) and well above (7,825 ng/mL) the RS-EC₉₀, respectively. Delamanid displayed no discernable RS ratio response, even at 16-times the human-equivalent dose. Higher pretomanid doses resulted in significantly greater RS ratio effects.

Conclusions: We found that delamanid and pretomanid have similar bactericidal activity but pretomanid has superior RS ratio activity. Meaningful differences between drugs within the same class were not captured by conventional CFU-based pharmacodynamics, supporting the value of measuring orthogonal drug effects such as the RS ratio.

Keywords: antibiotic; bactericidal activity; concentration response; dose ranging; pharmacodynamic; sterilizing activity; tuberculosis.

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest. The authors have no conflicts of interest.